Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorArgandoña-Mamani, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorOrmeño-Alarcón, Terry
dc.contributor.authorIparraguirre-Villanueva, Orlando
dc.contributor.authorPaulino-Moreno, Cleoge
dc.contributor.authorCabanillas-Carbonell, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-22T19:54:17Z
dc.date.available2024-05-22T19:54:17Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13067/3166
dc.description.abstractElection results are a topic that never stops being talked about and even more so that social platforms are the perfect medium where polarization to a political party is established. That is why many academics have seen the potential of this data source for the prediction of electoral elections. Therefore, it is necessary to review what kind of machine learning models perform better in predicting election results. Therefore, a literature review is carried out, following the guidelines of the PRISMA methodology, for which databases such as Scopus, IEEE-Xplore, Science Direct, Google Academic, Springer, Ebscohost, Iop, Wiley, and Sage were used. After the literature review analysis, a total of 1638 manuscripts related to the research topic were obtained, and the inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. Thus, 69 manuscripts were systematized. The results showed that one of the models most used by the scientific community is sentiment analysis. It was also noted that the best performing model was random forest (RF), with an accuracy rate of 97%. In the second place, we have the recurrent neural networks (RNNs) model with an accuracy rate of 91.6%. However, unlike RF, RNN requires a high computational knowledge and effort. Finally, it is concluded that the RF model is the most suitable for the prediction of electoral results since it can perform better in this type of case.es_PE
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_PE
dc.language.isoenges_PE
dc.publisherSpringer Linkes_PE
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_PE
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/es_PE
dc.subjectElection resultses_PE
dc.subjectSocial platformses_PE
dc.subjectPolarizationes_PE
dc.subjectPolitical partyes_PE
dc.titlePredicting Election Results with Machine Learning—A Reviewes_PE
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_PE
dc.identifier.journalProceedings of Eighth International Congress on Information and Communication Technologyes_PE
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.02.04es_PE
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3043-2_82es_PE
dc.source.volume695es_PE
dc.source.beginpage989es_PE
dc.source.endpage1001es_PE


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess